Transformation of Revolutionary and Religious Values between two Generations of Religious Families

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor at the Anthropology department/University of Tehran

2 university of tehran

Abstract

Following the Islamic revolution of Iran and during the last decades we have been witnessing considerable changes in the value systems and religious beliefs هد different generations of urban families. The value orientation of the youth generation could show a landscape of our future society so we tried to investigate this issue.We used mix method and interview & questionnaire techniques. Using the purposive method we chose 40 families.The findings show that there are apparent distinctions between the religiousness of the first and second generation. Moreover our findings indicate the behavioral (ritual) aspect of religiousness has been changed far more than the other aspects and overall the religiousness of the first generation has been higher than the second one. The distinction has also had correlation with sex namely among women were more than men. Both generations criticized going away from the initial values of Islamic revolution and call returning in them but the second generation took more reflexive and critical approach in this regard. Regarding the approach to the political system, both generations had low trust to the governance but the trust of the second generation was lower.

Keywords

References

آزاد ارمکی، تقی؛ و خادمی، حسن (1382). «ترجیحات ارزشی دانش‌آموزان تهرانی»، پژوهش‌نامۀ فرهنگی (فصلنامۀ تحقیقات فرهنگی)، شمارۀ 8، صص 8-28.
آزاد ارمکی، تقی؛ و غیاثوند، احمد (1391). جامعه‌شناسی تغییرات فرهنگی در ایران، تهران؛ آن.
برگر، پیتر ال. (1380). افول سکولاریسم، ترجمۀ افشار امیری، تهران: پنگان.
برگر، پیتر؛ برگر، بریجت؛ و کلنر، هانری (1381). ذهن بی‌خانمان (نوسازی و آگاهی)، ترجمۀ محمد ساوجی، تهران: نشرنی.
بشیریه، حسین (1388). جامعه‌شناسی سیاسی، تهران: نشرنی.
کرسول، جان (1391). پویش کیفی و طرح پژوهش، ترجمۀ حسن دانایی‌فرد و حسین کاظمی، تهران: صفار.
کرسول، جان (1391). طرح پژوهش رویکردهای کمی، کیفی و شیوۀ ترکیبی، ترجمۀ حسن دانایی‌فرد و علی صالحی، تهران: مهربان نشر.
یوسف‌زاده، حسن (1388). بررسی تحول آرای پیتر برگر دربارۀ دین و عرفی‌شدن، قم: مؤسسۀ آموزشی امام خمینی.
همیلتون، ملکوم (1378). جامعه‌شناسی دین، ترجمۀ محسن ثلاثی، تهران: کویر.
Ammerman, N. T. (2007). Everyday religion: Observing modern religious lives, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berger, P. L. (1967). The Sacred Canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion, Garden City NY: Doubleday.
Berger, P. (1980). From secularity to world religions, Christian Century 16.
Berger, P. (2001). Postscript, In Peter Berger and the Study of Religion, Edited by Linda Woodhead, London and New York: Routledge.
Berger, P. (2001). Reflections on the sociology of religion today, Retrieved from: www.findarticles.com
Bruce, S. (2001). The Curios of Unnecessary Recantation: Berger and Secularization, In Peter Berger and the study of religion, New York: Routledge.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (3rd Ed.), Sage.
Luckman, T. (1967). Invisible Religion; the Problem of Religion in Modern Society, New York: the Macmillan Company.
Rogers, E. (1969). Modernization among Peasants: The impact of communication, New York: Rinehart and Winston.
Woodhead, L., Heelas, P., & Martin, D. (2001). Peter Berger and the study of religion, London and New York: Routledge.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and post modernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 countries, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
 
 
Iranian Journal of Anthropological Research
Volume 10, Issue 1 - Serial Number 19
Indexing Databases
September 2020
Pages 31-54

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics