نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه توسعه اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشجوی دکتری توسعه اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Purpose- This study examines the social changes in families after the Sar-e-Pol-e-Zahab earthquake in 2017. The main question is what are the social changes in the family after the disaster and whether the earthquake and its relief process have affected the traditional foundations of the family, including the power structure and behavioral patterns of the family?
Methodology- The research method was a qualitative method using semi-structured in-depth interviews (12 families) and focus groups (13 groups) in the villages of "Koyik", "Shamshiri" and "Tami Hawas". The data were also analyzed using thematic analysis technique. The sample size includes thirteen focus groups and twelve semi-structured in-depth interviews from the key informants.
Findings- In the categorization of data extracted from interviews, the following central categories were obtained: “female leadership and precedence”, “normative rupture”, “increasing individualism in the family”, “increasing economic independence of women”, “changing dietary habits”, “changing sleep-wake cycle and increasing night waking”, and “changing young girls’ clothing from the indigenous style to the national style”. Among the results, the issue of weakening the patriarchal culture before the earthquake and the new leadership of women in advancing new family and social activities is very important. Because this new event has brought with it other forms of changes in lifestyle, health and eating habits. A more comprehensive understanding of the earthquake's consequences necessitates tracking these changes over time and examining their trajectory.
Conclusions- The changes that occurred as a result of the earthquake, while leading to challenges such as increased family conflicts, have created opportunities for redefining new norms and values in the family and local groups. The present study has attempted to provide an understanding of social changes after the earthquake, but this picture is related to a specific place and time period. And to fully understand the consequences of the earthquake, it is necessary to conduct more research and apply more findings to design practical and executive policies in the disaster field.
کلیدواژهها [English]
Ahdanjad, S. (2019). "Social vulnerability and capacity to rebuild societies. » Iranian Journal of Social Sciences, 15(3), 45-65. .[In percian]
Anbari M(2021) Bam Earthquake Tehran, Helal Press.
Anbari, M. (2013). Sociology of disaster, Tehran University Press. .[In percian].
Azkia, M., and Kamaluddini, M. (2016). "Forced marriage after disasters" Iranian Journal of Social Studies, 12(4), .[In percian]
Bradshaw, S., & Fordham, M. (2020). Gender and disaster. Routledge.
Elvy, S. A. (2015). The impacts of disasters on gender-based violence. Journal of Disaster Studies, Policy and Management, 40(2), 34-45.
Enarson, E. (1998). Through women's eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science. Disasters, 22(2), 157-173.
Fujii, S. (2016). The role of microfinance in post-disaster recovery: A study from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Disaster Management, 14(3), 92-104.
Gaillard, J. C., & Gomez, C. (2017). Resilience in disaster studies: Beyond the metaphor. Progress in Human Geography, 41(6), 23-34.
Hossain, M., Nahar, Q., & Ahmad, M. (2004). Domestic violence and women's health in post-flood situation in Bangladesh. BRAC Research and Evaluation Division.
Khan, M. (2012). Gender dimensions of the 2010 floods in Pakistan. Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI).
Killian, L. M. (1954). Some accomplishments and some needs in disaster study. Journal of Social Issues, 10(4), 66-72.
Lindell, M. K. (2021). Local emergency planning: Planning for disasters. Springer.
Mimaki, J., & Shaw, R. (2007). Urban risk reduction approaches in Kobe. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 56-70.
Pelling, M., & Dill, K. (2010). Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 21-37.
Peterson, A. (1990). Chernobyl and its aftermath: Social and psychological impacts. Disasters, 14(4), 78-90.
Raphael, B. (1996). When disaster strikes: A handbook for individuals and communities. Hutchinson.
Salimi, Mino, Naderi, Ahmed. (2019). "Study of the lived experience of Sarpol Zahab women in the earthquake" Social Science Quarterly, 27(88), pp. 217-251. doi: 10.22054/qjss.2020.44907.2134.[In percian]
Shadi Talab, Jhaleh (1993) Sociology of disaster: the experience of the Rudbar-Manjil earthquake, Tehran, Islamic Revolution Housing Foundation, first edition. .[In percian]
Shaditolab, J. (2004). "Crisis management, planning after the earthquake disaster, 2014", Social Sciences Quarterly, Ardibehesht Shadi. .[In percian]
Taylor, A. J., & Frazer, A. G. (2002). Sociological perspectives on disaster response. Social Science Journal, 20(2), 45-67.
UN Women. (2018). Women’s leadership in disaster resilience. UN Women Report.
UNDP. (2010). Chile: Post-earthquake recovery and reconstruction. United Nations Development Programme.
Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people's vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge.
Yadav, S. (2020). Gender dynamics in post-disaster recovery: The case of Nepal. Gender & Development, 28(1), 65-70.
Ziahoy, R. (2013). Family dynamics in disaster settings: Resilience and adaptation. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 39(2), 33-39.
)